The joy of doing Financial Independence wrong

August 6, 2019 23 By Caveman

A lot of the time I feel like I’m doing financial independence wrong. Basically I don’t find it particularly hard. Not from a practical point of view anyway (the emotional side is different). From an everyday perspective financial independence is meant to be a slog right? Putting in the hours today for a better tomorrow. Grinding out savings, watching every penny, hustling, compromising, sacrificing.

Thing is, I don’t do any of that. I buy lunch at work, I go out for a coffee. If a letter comes home from my kids’ schools about a trip I don’t think twice about saying yes. A friend asks if I want to go out to dinner: Let me know where and when. Our fridge blew up a month ago. A pain, but no problem. We had a new one delivered within 48 hours and a delivery to restock it a few hours later.

Is it because I’m fabulously wealthy? No, I mean I earn more than most – to be clear though if you earn more than £28,400 (median) or £34,200 (mean) in the UK then you earn more than most households. But, I don’t work in finance or software or medicine. In fact, I spent a good chunk of my career working as a mid-ranking official in the public sector (but without a final salary pension sadly). Don’t get me wrong I don’t slack, but I’m pretty much 9 to 5. It’s not even that I make money in other ways. I don’t have any side hustles.

In summary I don’t save right, I don’t earn right, and I don’t sacrifice right. My focus is on happiness now rather than just in the future. What the heck am I doing? Am doing Financial Independence wrong?

Doing Financial Independence wrong

This has all confused me for a while. Getting to Financial Independence for me is about keeping a sensible eye on costs without clamping down, putting some things on autopilot and then getting on with living life. I describe what I do in the 7 ½ rules that I follow but I’m not a slave to them.

The idea of Financial Independence needing to be hard and requiring sacrifice is deep in the roots of the movement. There is an odd machismo that underlies much Financial Independence writing. Arguably the prototype for financial independence was in Walden by Henry Thoreau. Live a bucolic, minimalist – bordering on survivalist – lifestyle. That was what it was like back then but, when we come to modern-day Financial Independence writers, that idea of a painful, sacrificial lifestyle really takes off.

Doing Financial Independence wrong: Financial Independence has got to be hard work right?

Financial Independence has got to be hard work right?

Early Retirement Extreme

I’ve just finished reading Early Retirement Extreme (ERE) by Jacob Lund Fisker. He was arguably the first of the contemporary FIRE writers to have become widely known. His book includes advice such as making food fuel not pleasure, you can wash your clothes using a bucket and plunger, suggesting not bothering with a fridge, being healthy means being able to carry or drag someone out of a burning building and being able to outrun or outfight someone who is chasing you.  I paraphrase, but not much.

The problem with that is that I just can’t relate to it. Can you? I’m fascinated by everything in this space but I honestly had to force myself to finish the book. The lifestyle that ERE espouses is just so far from anything that I could imagine myself wanting to live it. The word ‘Extreme’ in the title flags up the tacit acknowledgement that this approach isn’t for everyone. But, by repeated reference to the ideal of the ‘Renaissance Man’ that can live life like that, there is also a strong suggestion that you are a weak loser if you fall in any way short of that ideal. And people like me who pretty much reject most of the ideas in both theory and practise?  I’m left with the feeling that I would be dismissed with a disgusted sneer.

Mr Money Moustache

Following in his footsteps came Pete Adeney and Mr Money Moustache (MMM). While he praises ERE he has absolutely forged his own path. For many people MMM epitomises the FIRE movement. Through his blog, and beyond, he has done an incredible job in popularising the idea of Financial Independence. He is much more at the lighthearted but he is still at the more frugal end of the spectrum. I relate more to him than ERE but even with him there are things that I really struggle with.

The whole idea of the MMM ‘facepunch’ when you make poor financial decisions is obviously tongue in cheek and I understand that Pete is, in part, playing a character. This thing is, it suggests an underlying ‘bro culture’ that I struggle to want to be part of. There is a trope of the typical FIRE follower being a 20 something single, white male software engineer or banker. The face punch idea talks to that. To be clear there’s absolutely nothing wrong with any of those characteristics taken either individually or in any combination, but it does talk to a particular demographic that just isn’t me. My general approach to life is that, for the most part, if people screw up then you don’t humiliate or punish, you support and educate them to do better next time. I’m just a snowflake I guess.

Financial Samurai

To take another example from one of the earlier breakout FI bloggers, Sam Dogen at Financial Samurai takes the position that unless you’re saving so much that hurts a bit then you aren’t trying hard enough. To be clear I’m not saying that I endorse him or his opinions but no one can deny that his blog is amongst the more popular in the FI space.

The thing for me though is that I don’t subscribe to the no-pain, no-gain school of thought. The way I see it no-pain means, well, you don’t have any pain. I don’t understand those who make a fetish of being in pain. No pain is a good thing right?

Not being perverse

OK, OK I get it. MMM and ERE in particular are trying to get us all to look at the world differently. In the west the average consumer consumes and wastes an awful lot. Our culture has infantilised us to the extent that many of us don’t know how to replace a car tyre if we got a puncture (and I include myself in that). We have developed a throwaway culture where the default is to replace not repair. We get thirsty so we drive to the supermarket to buy water in plastic bottles that we put in plastic bags as we drive home sipping coffee in disposable single-use cups. That is clearly wrong in so many ways.

So, I understand what MMM and ERE are railing against. More than that I applaud it. As individuals and as society we need to be more like them. But, I wonder if the approach that the godfathers (and they are men) of Financial Independence have espoused ends up being counter-productive? Imagine you’re dipping your toe into the Financial Independence space. What you hear is that in order to become financially independent you need to wash your clothes in a bucket, save until you feel the pinch, and if you don’t then you’ll get a ‘face-punch’. I think that for a lot of people the reaction to that is going to be negative.

If it doesn’t hurt you’re not doing it right

While there have been multiple takes on the movement ever since those early pioneers, this sense that “if it’s not hurting you’re doing Financial Independence wrong” seems to pervade a lot of the writing in this space. Many people have countdowns to when they can quit jobs they hate. Others write about ERE style changes that they have made to their life.

Even very recently I watched the “Playing with FIRE” documentary and found it left me drained. I realise that it’s heresy to say this but I look at the life and friends that the family in the film left behind and I struggle to understand the logic. They could have made modest tweaks to their lifestyle.  This would have allowed them to keep more of the thing they valued with almost all of the benefits. To blow everything up and move away to pursue a slightly faster FI date seemed to me to be masochistic and pointless.

Most painful to watch were the times when the mother was upset when she realised that she wasn’t getting to spend enough time with her child as she was working so hard. That’s a trade-off that I don’t understand. Even by the end I wasn’t convinced that the sacrifice had been worth it for them – and they were just at the start of a very long haul.

When I look back I realise that there are multiple reasons why I didn’t start blogging sooner but one of those reasons was that I didn’t feel like I fitted in. I didn’t fit in with a world view that felt like it saw living a harsh life as a good thing.

Doing Financial Independence wrong: If it doesn't hurt are you doing it right?

If it doesn’t hurt are you doing it right?

Is there an alternative?

This is changing. As the Financial Independence movement gets more mature it becomes more nuanced. There are a small, but growing number of bloggers, like the Fioneers, who talk about the importance of being happy and enjoying the journey more.   As the Fioneers put it “I am no longer living my life according to the expectations of other people. I am going to live my life according to my own definition of success – what I value and want out of life.” For those writers delaying Financial Independence, even for years, to be happier now is seen as positive. Tread Lightly, Retire Early and others are doing great work to break down some of the clichés of what a typical striver towards financial independence looks like.

Similarly the purity of achieving financial independence is seen as less important. The hegemony of the idea that you must have a passive income stream that covers all of your expenses is waning. Instead we have the idea or Barista FIRE or Coast FI.  These are essentially variations of the idea that you have enough to retire at a ‘normal’ retirement age so just need to earn enough to cover your living expenses between now and then. You have the approach that Zach at Four Pillar Freedom is taking. He has worked his side hustles to the point where they can become his main hustles.  That means he has stepped back from his corporate job to do that full time instead (and is happier for it). This is in explicit contrast to those who hit their Financial Independence number and then realised that their side hustles largely sustain them anyway.

No one true path

To be clear there is no one right way to achieve Financial Independence. To say that someone is doing Financial Independence wrong is becoming a meaningless phrase.  Indeed, trying to achieve Financial Independence isn’t even going to be the path to happiness for everyone. It may well be right for some people, some of the time to sacrifice elements of their life and happiness to achieve their dream. There are plenty of examples across multiple sectors where people have made sacrifices get to where there want to be.  I’m not going to judge other people’s choices. How you get to the destination will depend of multiple factors to do with your personality, your reason for shooting for it, your personal family/stage of life circumstances and more.

Given that I am trying to achieve my goal though I need to find a way that works for me. To put in the the vernacular of our time: You gotta do you.

Financial independence without the sacrifice

The newer, gentler, Financial Independence philosophy is one that I can get behind. Save for tomorrow but don’t forget to live life today. Have a clear destination that is financial independence but also take time to smell the roses along the way. Maybe even decide to step off the path for a while so that I can return to the journey refreshed and reenergised. Absolutely get out of debt and don’t spend thoughtlessly. But, I have a handle on my outgoings and my spending is under control, so I’m not going to beat myself up if I take the kids to the cinema once in a while.

What I am shooting for is to be present in the present. I leave work at the reasonable time every day and work from home when I can. Given how comfortable I am where I’m at I haven’t looked for another job for years. Might that mean I miss out on a promotion or on a larger pay rise? Yes. In fact that’s likely to have already happened. I’m OK with that.

Consequences – but so what?

All of these things will almost certainly push out the date that I will be financially independent.  I’ve not run the numbers but it won’t be much.  If I had to guess I would say that the difference is maybe 3-6 months, possibly not even that. But in return for that additional time working I’m getting years of additional happiness. Years of memories that I’m building with my children by being at home after school, years of not having to wash my clothes in a bucket and seeing the taste of food as being equally important to its role as fuel. Years of not artificially feeling the pinch or guilty about spending.

Financial independence is a great thing to try to achieve, but I am not prepared to sacrifice my happiness for it.  I’m going to put aside my fraudulent feeling and do my journey my own way.  If it means I’m doing Financial Independence wrong I’m OK with that.

Thoughts?

Am I being unfair to the early Financial Independence movement?  Am I the one doing Financial Independence wrong?

Where do you stand in terms of balancing the destination of financial independence against enjoying the journey?